Agent Platform Scorecard

Who is building the agent operating system?

Twelve dimensions across seven providers. Re-graded as announcements land, with the market's reaction shown alongside.

Raw model intelligence is converging at the top. The real contest is orchestration, context, distribution, and trust. These are editorial grades, a considered read of the public record rather than a benchmark, held to a transparent rubric and re-graded live as announcements land. Baseline as of June 1, 2026.

#1
8
Google
7.8 overall

Intelligence wired into the surfaces a billion people already use.

#2
7
Microsoft
7.4 overall

AI metered into the world's enterprise workflows.

#3
7
OpenAI
7.2 overall

The assistant most people mean when they say 'AI'.

Dimension#1Google7.8#2Microsoft7.4#3OpenAI7.2#4Anthropic7.0#5Meta6.1#6Apple5.8#7xAI4.8
Assistant Intelligence
Raw capability
989976+28
Agent Capability
Can it actually do work?
778955+15
Conversational UX
Natural interaction quality
879676+27
Cross-App Actions
Real orchestration
785746+13
Personal Context
Memory and awareness
887468+14
Third-Party Integrations
Ecosystem reach
8+1878744
Developer APIs
Platform leverage
8899756
Model Strategy
Own the stack vs depend on partners
9698847
Agent Platform Potential
Future control-plane potential
8888655
On-Device AI
Privacy and latency
7621792
Enterprise Readiness
Business adoption
8978473
MyAGI Alignment
How close to an agent operating system
766755+14
Overall
Equal-weight average
7.87.47.27.06.15.84.8
Heat scale9leader7strong5developing3weakHover any cell for the rationale.
North-star dimension

MyAGI Alignment

Our north-star lens: how close is this provider to a true agent operating system? Earned (not asserted) capability, durable institutional memory, cross-app orchestration, and revocable, governable execution. The control plane for the agent era.

Current leader: Google (7.8 overall)

See where each is heading Read the analysis How we score